NZAIA
  • Home
    • Environmental Impact Assessment
    • Social Impact Assessment
    • Strategic Environmental Assessment
    • Community & Stakeholder Engagement
    • Management, Monitoring and Reporting
  • About Us
    • Core Group >
      • Core Group Meeting Minutes
    • Our Partners and Affiliates
    • AGMs
    • Ethics
  • Membership
    • Sign Up for NZAIA Membership
  • Conferences
    • Proceedings from Past Conferences >
      • 2022 - Wellbeing, Sustainability and Impact Assessment: towards more integrated policy-making
      • 2021 - Social Impact Assessment >
        • Posters
        • 2021 Students
      • 2019 - Climate Change >
        • Posters
        • 2019 Students
        • Conference Photos
        • Contact List
      • 2018 - Regional Development
      • 2016 - Strategic Environmental Assessment
      • 2015 - Where to for Impact Assessment?
      • 2014 - Transport Infrastructure
      • 2013 Fresh Water Management
      • 2012 - Mineral Extraction
  • Impact Connector
    • Issue #14 Impact assessment for infrastructure development >
      • Impact assessment for infrastructure development - an introduction
      • Place Matters: The importance of geographic assessment of areas of influence in understanding the social effects of large-scale transport investment in Wellington
      • Unplanned Consequences? New Zealand's experiment with urban (un)planning and infrastructure implications
      • Reflections on infrastructure, Town and Country planning and intimations of SIA in the late 1970s and early 1980s
      • SIA guidance for infrastructure and economic development projects
      • Scoping in impact assessments for infrastructure projects: Reflections on South African experiences
      • Impact Assessment for Pacific Island Infrastructure
    • Issue #13 Health impact assessment: practice issues >
      • Introduction to health impact assessment: practice issues
      • International Health Impact Assessment – a personal view
      • Use of Health Impact Assessment to develop climate change adaptation plans for health
      • An integrated approach to assessing health impacts
      • Assessing the health and social impacts of transport policies and projects
      • Whither HIA in New Zealand….or just wither?
    • Issue #12 Risk Assessment: Case Studies and Approaches >
      • Introduction
      • Risk Assessment and Impact Assessment : A perspective from Victoria, Australia
      • The New and Adaptive Paradigm Needed to Manage Rising Coastal Risks
      • Reflections on Using Risk Assessments in Understanding Climate Change Adaptation Needs in Te Taitokerau Northland
      • Values-Based Impact Assessment and Emergency Management
      • Certainty about Communicating Uncertainty: Assessment of Flood Loss and Damage
      • Improving Understanding of Rockfall Geohazard Risk in New Zealand
      • Normalised New Zealand Natural Disaster Insurance Losses: 1968-2019
      • Houston, We Have a Problem - Seamless Integration of Weather and Climate Forecast for Community Resilience
      • Innovating with Online Data to Understand Risk and Impact in a Data Poor Environment
    • Impact Connector #11 Climate Change Mitigation, Adaptation, and Impact Assessment: views from the Pacific >
      • Introduction
      • Climate change adaptation and mitigation, impact assessment, and decision-making: a Pacific perspective
      • Climate adaptation and impact assessment in the Pacific: overview of SPREP-sponsored presentations
      • Land and Sea: Integrated Assessment of the Temaiku Land and Urban Development Project in Kiribati
      • Strategic Environmental Assessment: Rising to the SDG Challenge
      • Coastal Engineering for Climate Change Resilience in Eastern Tongatapu, Tonga
      • Climate-induced Migration in the Pacific: The Role of New Zealand
    • Impact Connector #10 Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation >
      • Introduction
      • Is a “just transition” possible for Māori?
      • Adapting to Climate Change on Scale: Addressing the Challenge and Understanding the Impacts of Asia Mega-Cities
      • How responding to climate change might affect health, for better or for worse
      • Kanuka, Kereru and carbon capture - Assessing the effects of a programme taking a fresh look at the hill and high country land resource
      • Wairoa: Community perceptions of increased afforestation
      • Te Kākahu Kahukura Ecological Restoration project: A story within a story
    • Issue #9 Impacts of Covid-19 >
      • Introduction to Impact Connector Issue 9 – Impact assessment and Covid 19
      • Covid-19 fast-track consenting: climate change legacy key to success
      • Tourism – the long haul ahead
      • Making sense of the impact of Covid-19: planning, politics, and the public good
    • Issue #8 Social Impact Assessment >
      • Challenges for Social Impact Assessment in New Zealand: looking backwards and looking forwards
      • Insights from the eighties: early Social Impact Assessment reports on rural community dynamics
      • Impact Assessment and the Capitals Framework: A Systems-based Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Wellbeing
      • Building resilience in Rural Communities – a focus on mobile population groups
      • Assessing the Impacts of a New Cycle Trail: A Fieldnote
      • The challenges of a new biodiversity strategy for social impact assessment (SIA)
      • “Say goodbye to traffic”? The role of SIA in establishing whether ‘air taxis’ are the logical next step in the evolution of transportation
    • Issue #7 Ecological Impact Assessment >
      • The future of Ecological Impact Assessment in New Zealand
      • Ecological impact assessment and roading projects
      • EcIA and the Resource Management Act
      • Professional Practice and implementation of EcIA
      • EcIA in the Marine Environment
    • Issue #6 Landscape Assessment >
      • Introduction
      • Lives and landscapes: who cares, what about, and does it matter?
      • Regional Landscape Inconsistency
      • Landscape management in the new world order
      • Landscape assessment and the Environment Court
      • Natural character assessments and provisions in a coastal environment
      • The Assessment and Management of Amenity
      • The rise of the THIMBY
      • Landscape - Is there a common understanding of the Common?
    • Issue #5 Cultural Impact Assessment >
      • Introduction
      • Potential of Cultural Impact Assessment
      • The Mitigation Dilemma
      • CIA and decision-making
      • Insights and observations on CIA
      • Achieving sustainability through CIA
      • CIA - Enhancing or diminishing mauri?
      • Strategic Indigenous Impact Assessment?
    • Issue #4 Marine Environment >
      • Introduction
      • Iwi, Impact Assessment and Marine Environment
      • Sea-Bed Mining Application in Taranaki
      • The wreck of the MV Rena
      • High Court RMA Controls on Fishing
      • Initiatives in the Pacific Islands
      • SEA in an NZ context
    • Issue #3 Strategic Environmental Assessment
    • Issue #2
    • Issue #1
  • Resources
    • Webinars
    • IAIA Resources
    • United Nations Guidance
    • Donors Guidelines and Principles
    • Oceania and the Pacific
    • Natural Systems >
      • Biodiversity & Ecosystem Services
      • Agriculture & Food Systems
      • Water Management
    • Social Impact Assessment
    • Health Impact Assessment >
      • Climate Change & Health
      • Air Quality Impact Assessment
    • Cumulative Impact Assessment
    • Community and Stakeholder Engagement
    • Indigenous Peoples
    • Climate Change and Disaster Risk Resilience >
      • Adaptation Planning
      • Nature-based Solutions
    • Urban Development
    • Sustainable Development Goals
    • Strategic Environmental Assessment
  • Community
    • Membership Directory
    • News
    • Policy Submissions >
      • Past Submissions
    • Courses

Reflections on Using Risk Assessments in Understanding Climate Change Adaptation Needs in Te Taitokerau Northland

Matthew de Boer 
​


He Pou a Rangi NZ Climate Change Commission 

​formerly with Northland Regional Council
At the time of writing Matt was Climate Resilience Coordinator at Northland Regional Council and chair of Climate Adaptation Te Taitokerau. He is now working as senior analyst at He Pou a Rangi, the New Zealand Climate Change Commission. This work is the viewpoint of the author and does not represent the views of either Northland Regional Council or the Climate Change Commission.
​Climate adaptation involves using understandings of projected climate impacts on society and the natural environment to develop appropriate flexible responses, often using a risk management approach.
 
Due to the complexities associated with understanding climate risks, adaptation practitioners face challenges in developing appropriate and effective adaptation actions and policies. Obstacles include inherent uncertainty in the type, timing, severity and interactions of climate hazards and stressors, complexities arising from their cross-scale, cascading and cross-sectoral interactions, and idiosyncratic consequences on different elements of society and the environment.
 
Other issues relate to the diversity of evidence and varieties in underlying assumptions and the ability of risk assessments to provide guidance for adaptation decision-making and planning[1]. While risk assessment is a commonly used tool by local government to characterise climate risks, additional work and creative application is required to advance its use as an effective adaptation decision-support tool. This discussion piece explores ways in which risk assessments have recently contributed to the understanding of climate impacts for local government in Northland, New Zealand.
 
Risk assessment involves formal methods and processes to describe the nature and level of risk for an event or action, commonly estimated by multiplying the consequence of a hazard event with its likelihood. Risk registers are used by local governments to compare risks across financial, organisational, reputational, and operational domains; at the time of writing, climate change risks top the risk register for one Northland council. One assessment of organisational risk in Northland was calculated by comparing how well different climate hazards were understood (i.e. data maturity), the role councils play in managing the hazard (level of responsibility) with the potential consequences. This helped give an indication of priority actions for councils to manage different climate risks, including information gathering, policy development, adaptation planning and risk management interventions. These priorities were key to informing the development of a regional adaptation strategy.
 
New Zealand’s first National Climate Change Risk Assessment[2] considered the impacts of multiple hazards on societal values grouped into five broad ‘value domains’ (the natural environment, built environment, human, economy and governance domains). This approach provides a pragmatic way to create high-level qualitative summaries of climate change impacts from multiple hazards but tends to compartmentalise and separate socio-ecological values, creating a fragmented framing of climate risks. For adaptation practitioners, the approach can create problems in a practical sense when attempting to develop adaptive solutions for climate hazards that cut across different domains. 
the He Ara Waiora framework (Ministry for the Environment, 2019)
The He Ara Waiora framework (Ministry for the Environment, 2019)
When developing a ‘first-pass’ climate risk assessment, Northland councils responded by using systems diagrams to show causal interactions between climate hazards and affected areas of society and the environment. This approach helped describe cascading impacts between domains and hazards, such as where responses to drought can lead to the lowering of water tables, affecting springs and river flows and compounding the impact of saline intrusion due to sea level rise in coastal communities. Nonetheless, feedback from iwi and hapū indicated that the approach still failed to incorporate a te ao Māori worldview in its framing of societal values.
 
Exposure assessments are common quantitative climate risk assessment approach used by councils, for instance using spatial analysis to count the number of affected ‘value elements’ (e.g. houses, marae) that might be impacted by sea level rise and coastal hazards. While this process is relatively straightforward, quantifying consequences is less so. An example is where indicators such as criticality measures, or depth damage loss assessments are used to understand consequence for council infrastructure assets. While this approach is efficient in that can use existing data, it often ignores impacts such as those on wider network connectivity, and the differential impacts between communities, which are more difficult to define.
 
The development of more nuanced risk assessment methodologies attempts to resolve this issue, such as the IPCC’s definition of climate change risk for the AR6 report[3] which acknowledges the important role of vulnerability in assessing climate risk. Vulnerability assessments can be plagued by both the practical limitations of available tools and data, as well as conflicting framings and value systems in deciding what evidence is included and how it is assessed. Many vulnerability heuristics use combinations of census data such as indices of social deprivation as a proxy[4], potentially missing key factors that may be in fact primary drivers of sensitivity or adaptive capacity.
 
For instance, remote Māori communities in Northland show some of the poorest social deprivation statistics in the country, including per-household income. However, these same communities led highly responsive and effective drought responses in the 2020 summer drought where many remote marae, communities and farms ran out of water. Drawing on extensive community relationships, Māori communities quickly developed systems of water distribution to the needy, independent of, and arguably more efficiently than, well-resourced local government responses. Responses to Covid19 have been similarly well-coordinated in Northland Māori communities, indicating a high level of adaptive capacity.

Different knowledge systems and worldviews bring alternative approaches for engaging with climate change impacts and framing conversations on climate change adaptation. While they can be complementary, they can also present incommensurable evidence and conflicting value systems and without appropriate processes to integrate different perspectives, can inhibit the development of appropriate adaptation responses. In 1995, Funtowicz and Ravetz[5] argued that the interface of science and society was witnessing the emergence of new problems characterised by being long-term, novel and complex, with the best scientific representation by untestable models that include large uncertainties in variables. In addition, they observed that decision-making processes on environmental risk were becoming fraught due to uncertainty in knowledge, high decision stakes, values in dispute and a growing sense of urgency.
Picture
Over twenty-five years later, these observations are no less relevant, and it appears that in addressing the impacts of climate change, we are still to realise practical methodologies that ‘enhance the process of the social resolution of the problem, including participation and mutual learning among the stakeholders, rather than a definite “solution” or technological implementation’[6]. What is needed is a deliberative approach involving the co-production of knowledge (including local, indigenous and expert knowledges), the democratisation of expert, political and bureaucratic power, and processes to ensure the inclusion of ‘values without a voice’ of non-human taonga and future generations. Encouragingly, local governments are adopting more inclusive engagement processes in assessing risks, but we have a long way to go.
 
One Northland example is in the co-development of mutually agreed coastal hazard information. Following the publication of new coastal hazard maps, there were conflicting community views on the accuracy of the models. In response council engineers, farmers, and drainage managers collaborated to ensure that topographic models derived from LiDAR data reflected the on-ground reality. Clear, grounded communication helped facilitate this process, although differences remain in perceptions of sea level rise values that exceed the lived intergenerational experiences of locals.
 
Facilitating collaborative adaptation engagement and planning with communities, including using the ‘dynamic adaptive pathways’ approach advocated by the Ministry for the Environment[7], is one way councils can co-develop long-term adaptation solutions with communites, bringing together both regulatory (such as land-use planning policies and rules) and non-regulatory (such as the provision of infrastructure, information, spatial planning  and support for communities) solutions. This approach includes a step devoted to understanding community values and “what matters most”. However, as promising as the prospect of co-designed adaptation planning seems, questions arise concerning the influence of power and framing, what constitutes acceptable knowledge and evidence, and conflicting values in decision-making processes.
 
Northland councils are developing place-based approaches to adaptation engagement that use methods appropriate for local communities, using region-wide climate hazard data to understand and map community adaptation needs. Exposure assessments were undertaken using a spatial analysis of a small range of community indicators against 3 hazard types (coastal erosion, storm surge flooding and high-tide flooding) at three scenarios (represented by timeframes and indicative sea level rise values). Alongside a consideration of community attributes (like population size, cultural values and desire for self-determination), the exposure assessments informed the development of adaptation profiles for around 70 communities. These profiles identify areas with urgent need or desire for adaptation planning, and help define the types of engagement approach appropriate at the local level. Councils have received feedback from Māori that in some locations, hapū- and iwi-led planning processes will be more appropriate than a council-led process; in others the administration and resources required to develop adaptation plans mean a larger role for councils.
Picture
Photo: RNZ / Alexa Cook
Further work is required to ensure that adaptation planning processes embed Māori perspectives; a first step in that process is developing appropriate risk assessment approaches. Hapū and iwi have reiterated the need for tools to consider climate impacts on cultural resources, papakāinga and marae, to enable hapū-led adaptation planning at the local scale. This bottom-up approach will help communicate climate risk in meaningful ways with Māori communities, potentially by working with local knowledge-holders to set parameters how to appropriately combine Western science and risk analysis with indigenous knowledge and apply this in appropriate planning contexts. The approach will also support iwi and hapū to develop their own adaptation plans, by providing tools, hazards advice and other support, while ensuring data sovereignty.
 
Reducing uncertainty in hazard data and impact consequences is not sufficient to address the issues facing local government in using risk assessments to develop adaptation actions and policies. Moving toward increased participation by communities and tangata whenua in climate risk assessments is a necessary step toward the resolution of incommensurable evidence and conflicting value frameworks in adaptation planning.
Download as a PDF

​References 

[1] Adger WN, Brown I, Surminski S. 2018 Advances in risk assessment for climate change adaptation policy. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376: 20180106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0106

[2] https://environment.govt.nz/publications/national-climate-change-risk-assessment-for-new-zealand-main-report/

[3] Reisinger, Andy, Mark Howden, Carolina Vera, et al. (2020) The Concept of Risk in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report: A Summary of Cross-Working Group Discussions. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland. pp15 retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2021/02/Risk-guidance-FINAL_15Feb2021.pdf

[4] See for example: https://www.ehinz.ac.nz/indicators/population-vulnerability/social-vulnerability-to-natural-hazards/

[5] Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1995). Science for the post normal age (pp. 146-161). Springer Netherlands.​

​
[6] Mayumi, K., & Giampietro, M. (2006). The epistemological challenge of self-modifying systems: governance and sustainability in the post-normal science era. Ecological Economics, 57(3), 382-399.

[7] https://environment.govt.nz/publications/coastal-hazards-and-climate-change-guidance-for-local-government/
CONTACT US
​NZAIA Incorporated is a registered charity 
#CC54658
This website and all its content is SSL Protected. 
Privacy Policy

  • Home
    • Environmental Impact Assessment
    • Social Impact Assessment
    • Strategic Environmental Assessment
    • Community & Stakeholder Engagement
    • Management, Monitoring and Reporting
  • About Us
    • Core Group >
      • Core Group Meeting Minutes
    • Our Partners and Affiliates
    • AGMs
    • Ethics
  • Membership
    • Sign Up for NZAIA Membership
  • Conferences
    • Proceedings from Past Conferences >
      • 2022 - Wellbeing, Sustainability and Impact Assessment: towards more integrated policy-making
      • 2021 - Social Impact Assessment >
        • Posters
        • 2021 Students
      • 2019 - Climate Change >
        • Posters
        • 2019 Students
        • Conference Photos
        • Contact List
      • 2018 - Regional Development
      • 2016 - Strategic Environmental Assessment
      • 2015 - Where to for Impact Assessment?
      • 2014 - Transport Infrastructure
      • 2013 Fresh Water Management
      • 2012 - Mineral Extraction
  • Impact Connector
    • Issue #14 Impact assessment for infrastructure development >
      • Impact assessment for infrastructure development - an introduction
      • Place Matters: The importance of geographic assessment of areas of influence in understanding the social effects of large-scale transport investment in Wellington
      • Unplanned Consequences? New Zealand's experiment with urban (un)planning and infrastructure implications
      • Reflections on infrastructure, Town and Country planning and intimations of SIA in the late 1970s and early 1980s
      • SIA guidance for infrastructure and economic development projects
      • Scoping in impact assessments for infrastructure projects: Reflections on South African experiences
      • Impact Assessment for Pacific Island Infrastructure
    • Issue #13 Health impact assessment: practice issues >
      • Introduction to health impact assessment: practice issues
      • International Health Impact Assessment – a personal view
      • Use of Health Impact Assessment to develop climate change adaptation plans for health
      • An integrated approach to assessing health impacts
      • Assessing the health and social impacts of transport policies and projects
      • Whither HIA in New Zealand….or just wither?
    • Issue #12 Risk Assessment: Case Studies and Approaches >
      • Introduction
      • Risk Assessment and Impact Assessment : A perspective from Victoria, Australia
      • The New and Adaptive Paradigm Needed to Manage Rising Coastal Risks
      • Reflections on Using Risk Assessments in Understanding Climate Change Adaptation Needs in Te Taitokerau Northland
      • Values-Based Impact Assessment and Emergency Management
      • Certainty about Communicating Uncertainty: Assessment of Flood Loss and Damage
      • Improving Understanding of Rockfall Geohazard Risk in New Zealand
      • Normalised New Zealand Natural Disaster Insurance Losses: 1968-2019
      • Houston, We Have a Problem - Seamless Integration of Weather and Climate Forecast for Community Resilience
      • Innovating with Online Data to Understand Risk and Impact in a Data Poor Environment
    • Impact Connector #11 Climate Change Mitigation, Adaptation, and Impact Assessment: views from the Pacific >
      • Introduction
      • Climate change adaptation and mitigation, impact assessment, and decision-making: a Pacific perspective
      • Climate adaptation and impact assessment in the Pacific: overview of SPREP-sponsored presentations
      • Land and Sea: Integrated Assessment of the Temaiku Land and Urban Development Project in Kiribati
      • Strategic Environmental Assessment: Rising to the SDG Challenge
      • Coastal Engineering for Climate Change Resilience in Eastern Tongatapu, Tonga
      • Climate-induced Migration in the Pacific: The Role of New Zealand
    • Impact Connector #10 Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation >
      • Introduction
      • Is a “just transition” possible for Māori?
      • Adapting to Climate Change on Scale: Addressing the Challenge and Understanding the Impacts of Asia Mega-Cities
      • How responding to climate change might affect health, for better or for worse
      • Kanuka, Kereru and carbon capture - Assessing the effects of a programme taking a fresh look at the hill and high country land resource
      • Wairoa: Community perceptions of increased afforestation
      • Te Kākahu Kahukura Ecological Restoration project: A story within a story
    • Issue #9 Impacts of Covid-19 >
      • Introduction to Impact Connector Issue 9 – Impact assessment and Covid 19
      • Covid-19 fast-track consenting: climate change legacy key to success
      • Tourism – the long haul ahead
      • Making sense of the impact of Covid-19: planning, politics, and the public good
    • Issue #8 Social Impact Assessment >
      • Challenges for Social Impact Assessment in New Zealand: looking backwards and looking forwards
      • Insights from the eighties: early Social Impact Assessment reports on rural community dynamics
      • Impact Assessment and the Capitals Framework: A Systems-based Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Wellbeing
      • Building resilience in Rural Communities – a focus on mobile population groups
      • Assessing the Impacts of a New Cycle Trail: A Fieldnote
      • The challenges of a new biodiversity strategy for social impact assessment (SIA)
      • “Say goodbye to traffic”? The role of SIA in establishing whether ‘air taxis’ are the logical next step in the evolution of transportation
    • Issue #7 Ecological Impact Assessment >
      • The future of Ecological Impact Assessment in New Zealand
      • Ecological impact assessment and roading projects
      • EcIA and the Resource Management Act
      • Professional Practice and implementation of EcIA
      • EcIA in the Marine Environment
    • Issue #6 Landscape Assessment >
      • Introduction
      • Lives and landscapes: who cares, what about, and does it matter?
      • Regional Landscape Inconsistency
      • Landscape management in the new world order
      • Landscape assessment and the Environment Court
      • Natural character assessments and provisions in a coastal environment
      • The Assessment and Management of Amenity
      • The rise of the THIMBY
      • Landscape - Is there a common understanding of the Common?
    • Issue #5 Cultural Impact Assessment >
      • Introduction
      • Potential of Cultural Impact Assessment
      • The Mitigation Dilemma
      • CIA and decision-making
      • Insights and observations on CIA
      • Achieving sustainability through CIA
      • CIA - Enhancing or diminishing mauri?
      • Strategic Indigenous Impact Assessment?
    • Issue #4 Marine Environment >
      • Introduction
      • Iwi, Impact Assessment and Marine Environment
      • Sea-Bed Mining Application in Taranaki
      • The wreck of the MV Rena
      • High Court RMA Controls on Fishing
      • Initiatives in the Pacific Islands
      • SEA in an NZ context
    • Issue #3 Strategic Environmental Assessment
    • Issue #2
    • Issue #1
  • Resources
    • Webinars
    • IAIA Resources
    • United Nations Guidance
    • Donors Guidelines and Principles
    • Oceania and the Pacific
    • Natural Systems >
      • Biodiversity & Ecosystem Services
      • Agriculture & Food Systems
      • Water Management
    • Social Impact Assessment
    • Health Impact Assessment >
      • Climate Change & Health
      • Air Quality Impact Assessment
    • Cumulative Impact Assessment
    • Community and Stakeholder Engagement
    • Indigenous Peoples
    • Climate Change and Disaster Risk Resilience >
      • Adaptation Planning
      • Nature-based Solutions
    • Urban Development
    • Sustainable Development Goals
    • Strategic Environmental Assessment
  • Community
    • Membership Directory
    • News
    • Policy Submissions >
      • Past Submissions
    • Courses